Why muddy the water and make this an argument about responsible pet ownership when you can just slam pit bulls for how viscious the attack was?But aside from Petey's occasional belligerence, Sword had never seen any problems.
ilovemybacon wrote:What about that french woman who got her face bit off by her pet Lab...I had to read three pages into the story to find out what kind of dog it was. Does anyone doubt that if it was a pitbull that would have been the headline? I just can't stand it anymore.
sadowner wrote:No it wasnt. It was giving back ground on the area. Showing it wasnt the typical drug infested place that pit bull attacks take place most of the time.
Thats what I got out of it anyway.
sadowner wrote:No it wasnt. It was giving back ground on the area. Showing it wasnt the typical drug infested place that pit bull attacks take place most of the time.
Thats what I got out of it anyway.
sadowner wrote:exactly. The dog should have been put down or at the very least not had puppies at all.
People say "apbt's should never show human agression, its not in their breed" then when their dog bites them they want to sugar coat it and say "well he/she needs training , or It was my fault " Thats bull, A violent dog should be put down period.
You cant have it both ways. You cant tell people how these dogs are misunderstood. They are not misunderstood.You cant say its all the media , This happend, what you read happend, it wasnt a lab or a rott it was a pitbull. Making excuses only helps pitbull haters ignore you more. Deal with the issue. Yes Its happening, why is it happening? Is it the breed plain and simple? No Is It because these dogs are extreamly popular now and being bred by everyone with very bad results in terms of the litters? Yes.
sadowner wrote:How was the story overdone? Its what happend the facts they posted were just that , facts. Im sure as pitbull owners no one likes it but if we are going to deal with what is happening we need to stop with the damn sugar coating.
Sure you dont see stories like the one with the lady and the lab as much on the news. Know why? Because you dont have low life jackass's inbreeding the same violent labs over and over for money like you do with pitbulls these days and because of that, there are noplace near the attacks by labs then pits.
Its time to get real. Do pits attack? Yes esp in big cities it seems like a daily thing. Is it because they are just plain evil man killing dogs? NO its because of all the stupid people breeding them for $$$$ creating monster mutts that bite ,maul and kill people. No one is going to listen to us pitbull owners untill we are honest with ourselves.
Talking about how the neighborhood was like pleasantville before pit bulls. His 'pageboy haircut', harkening back to childhood images of paperboys on bikes and lemonade stands. 'Coffee chats'. 'Girl Scouts'. Shovelling each others driveways. 'Suburban dreams'. UGH!
The story really seems to pound in the point of breed unpredictability. So no matter how great your dogs are, they cannot be used as a positve example, ever. Even though they say that the dog involved had been growling and snapping at people and was kicked out of obedience class. They dismiss all that and rebuild their unpredictabity argument:
Quote:
But aside from Petey's occasional belligerence, Sword had never seen any problems.
Why muddy the water and make this an argument about responsible pet ownership when you can just slam pit bulls for how viscious the attack was?
Return to Pit Bull news and BSL
Users browsing this forum: No registered users