mnp13 wrote:It's back on all of the forums currently, but it's not going to stay that way. The other thing I can do is log all changes so if anyone pulls something I can get the original post back, but I'd rather not have that headache.
After a little while, what's the difference? Once someone has responded the post there isn't any reason to go back and edit it - that's like trying to take back something you have already said. We don't want anyone trying to unring bells here.
If anyone can think of a reason that they would need to edit a post longer than a little while after putting it up, I'm all ears.
mnp13 wrote::|
It's already been abused here, and this is the calmest forum I've ever been on.
Again, what need would anyone have to edit a post that has been up for a day?
04100824 wrote:mnp13 wrote::|
It's already been abused here, and this is the calmest forum I've ever been on.
Again, what need would anyone have to edit a post that has been up for a day?
This is the calmest one you've been on?!
LOL! This is one of the ones I go to to catch up on drama!
cheekymunkee wrote:04100824 wrote:mnp13 wrote::|
It's already been abused here, and this is the calmest forum I've ever been on.
Again, what need would anyone have to edit a post that has been up for a day?
This is the calmest one you've been on?!
LOL! This is one of the ones I go to to catch up on drama!
So you want drama do you?????
a-bull wrote:I think so, particularly given the varied opinions . . . and you guys aren't banning people wildly for having varied opinions . . .
a-bull wrote:I know, but I'm such a rebel.
Marinepits wrote:a-bull wrote:I know, but I'm such a rebel.
Um, that's one word for what you are, LOL!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users