JCleve86 wrote:From what I gathered from Scot's post, he said he didn't send the results in to any "official" agency but rather read the films himself and found them to be worthy of breeding the dog.
I really don't see how you can compare Diane...who has told folks for years there is no reason to breed and has pushed her rescue efforts...to Scot, who is a responsible breeder. I haven't done the research on Tyson, but from what I gather, his breeder isn't pumping out two litters in one month and selling puppies to anyone with 700 dollars. To me, even if it's "just" an ethical difference between the breeders, it's all the difference in the world. I also don't see how you could compare Scot...who, as he has publicly stated, is making every effort to unify to breed to Diane...who...as anyone who has seen her interactions can see...without making efforts manages to tinkle a LOT of people off and stir up conflict in the breed. Even within the same crowd (rescue). Even within the same damn rescue group.
At that, I don't think it's the lack of health testing...it's that Totanka is a puppy mill, and yet Diane acted like whoopsy, no biggy, cause it's ME, not one of you morons. Neither Scot nor Kim ever flaunted their actions NEARLY as much as this and made their plans clear...to improve the breed by using these great dogs as "foundations" ...AND we have reason to believe them. What is Diane's purpose with this puppy? To breed her? How can she do that in her condition?
I can see where you are coming from, but I think your focusing too much on one of the issues (lack of health testing) and not seeing the big picture.
Sariss wrote:I had never heard of her posting about dogs that had been killed in her yard. Was that on PBF?
odnarb wrote:Flat out, Diane's delivery was very poor. She can be very crass, and insensitive.
But, my problem is the blatant hypocracy all around. It's terrible if Diane buys from a dog from somebody who doesn't health test, but it's fine if Matrix and Roki do it.
Even now, everyone is kissing Scot's fanny when he's SAYING that he health tested his dog, but won't provide proof. If it were anyone else saying they have nothing to prove, they would lynch them. I remember when he first showed up a few years ago. He was showing a 25 inch dog that was over 100 lbs (but he was balanced! LOL). How quickly things change!
concreterose wrote:odnarb wrote:Flat out, Diane's delivery was very poor. She can be very crass, and insensitive.
But, my problem is the blatant hypocracy all around. It's terrible if Diane buys from a dog from somebody who doesn't health test, but it's fine if Matrix and Roki do it.
Even now, everyone is kissing Scot's fanny when he's SAYING that he health tested his dog, but won't provide proof. If it were anyone else saying they have nothing to prove, they would lynch them. I remember when he first showed up a few years ago. He was showing a 25 inch dog that was over 100 lbs (but he was balanced! LOL). How quickly things change!
Scot did not come on a message board where he has a LOT of influence over members and basically tell everyone to KISS off because he bought a dog from a puppymill. Funny how you are crying hypocracy and feeling people are showing favortism towards Scot as a responsible breeder because you are publicly called out for comparing him to Diane. It's comparing apples and oranges. Diane was NOT banned for buying a dog from a puppymill, she's done it before and everybody knows. It's the slap in the face way she posted about it as well as other things she has said that has been building up to this moment. Honestly, your railings and dragging other people in the whole Diane situation to subtly discredit them are becoming quite tiresome. You come across as being a very vindictive person.
Scot did not come on a message board where he has a LOT of influence over members and basically tell everyone to KISS off because he bought a dog from a puppymill. Funny how you are crying hypocracy and feeling people are showing favortism towards Scot as a responsible breeder because you are publicly called out for comparing him to Diane. It's comparing apples and oranges. Diane was NOT banned for buying a dog from a puppymill, she's done it before and everybody knows. It's the slap in the face way she posted about it as well as other things she has said that has been building up to this moment. Honestly, your railings and dragging other people in the whole Diane situation to subtly discredit them are becoming quite tiresome. You come across as being a very vindictive person.
Like what exactly?I am missing it.
BUHBEE the english bully who loves life and is such a free spirit.
Now, now, Red, we all can't have oriental carpet in our spotless garages
Darlazmum wrote: I mean throw the lady a bone, look at them, you know your gonna write on your website , thus getting coverage, and all you can say is the one you saw was ill tempered?!? Why say anything if you can't give a positive spin on it?
Just me.
concreterose wrote:Funny how you are crying hypocracy and feeling people are showing favortism towards Scot as a responsible breeder because you are publicly called out for comparing him to Diane. It's comparing apples and oranges.
Honestly, your railings and dragging other people in the whole Diane situation to subtly discredit them are becoming quite tiresome. You come across as being a very vindictive person.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users