GregMK9 wrote:As I said previously, justified had the dog bitten when he did not leave. Nonjustifiable when he was leaving as there is no longer a threat present.
GregMK9 wrote: I showed the original post to a friend of mine who is an AA county police officer just a short while ago because I wanted his opinion. I asked that when he was done reading it to then replace jumped on with the dog bit. His opinion is the guy did nothing wrong.
LMM wrote:I just have to say, and I am not a police officer, if someone mentioned a gun in the manner in which this guy did my first thought (being a little nervous/annoyed already) would be "whoa, he has a gun?!". I would assume, right or wrong, that he had it on him if he was offering it up.
Is it an assumption? Sure it is but it's not a ridiculous assumption to make given this entire situation.
Jackuul wrote:Too bad the country cannot rewind its mindset to the 1910's when the APBT was the "American Dog".
cheekymunkee wrote:LMM wrote:I just have to say, and I am not a police officer, if someone mentioned a gun in the manner in which this guy did my first thought (being a little nervous/annoyed already) would be "whoa, he has a gun?!". I would assume, right or wrong, that he had it on him if he was offering it up.
Is it an assumption? Sure it is but it's not a ridiculous assumption to make given this entire situation.
Yup, and assuming that the guy did not have a gun ( even though he SAID he did) will often times get one killed. I always assume ( silly me) that when a person SAYS they have a gun, that they do indeed have one. Maybe they do, maybe they don't. I aint taking the chance personally. However others are free to do what you wish.
cheekymunkee wrote:Yup, and assuming that the guy did not have a gun ( even though he SAID he did) will often times get one killed. I always assume ( silly me) that when a person SAYS they have a gun, that they do indeed have one. Maybe they do, maybe they don't. I aint taking the chance personally. However others are free to do what you wish.
GregMK9 wrote:Yes, it probably would change as would anyone else's I'm sure. I don't mean to seem like I'm downplaying your situation cause I'm not. It was a very real threat. Just honestly didn't really like the way it came back on my fiance. She didn't deserve to be badgered like that. It's funny how b/c people don't know her they try to downplay her dog knowledge when she knows more then most. I honestly think there's a lot of people on here who are nothing more then keyboard dog trainers but I never badger or try to publicly degrade them. It's not fair to the person or the people who frequent the board to gain useful knowledge or post useful info.
iluvk9 wrote:I think it is nice that Greg showed up to give another point of view AND defend the love of his life.
GregMK9 wrote:Yes, it probably would change as would anyone else's I'm sure. I don't mean to seem like I'm downplaying your situation cause I'm not. It was a very real threat. Just honestly didn't really like the way it came back on my fiance. She didn't deserve to be badgered like that. It's funny how b/c people don't know her they try to downplay her dog knowledge when she knows more then most. I honestly think there's a lot of people on here who are nothing more then keyboard dog trainers but I never badger or try to publicly degrade them. It's not fair to the person or the people who frequent the board to gain useful knowledge or post useful info.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users