Grant County, Oregon POLL! PLEASE VOTE

[cheekymunkee]

Click link to vote...



http://bluemountaineagle.com/main.asp?S ... tionID=186

[KJS]

Some communities have set fees, required muzzles or restricted ownership of pit bull dogs. What do you think?

66%• The problem is inadequate training, so regulations should focus on the owner, not the dogs.
21%• Pit bulls are prone to overprotection or violence, so regulating them makes sense.
11%• Restrictions should only apply to dogs with a history of attacks.
1%• Let all dogs run free — people need to wise up and protect themselves.
0%• Not sure
1%• Don't care
Total Voters: 178

[gayrghts]

67%• The problem is inadequate training, so regulations should focus on the owner, not the dogs.
20%• Pit bulls are prone to overprotection or violence, so regulating them makes sense.
12%• Restrictions should only apply to dogs with a history of attacks.
1%• Let all dogs run free — people need to wise up and protect themselves.
0%• Not sure
1%• Don't care

[iluvk9]

Voted.

[Malli]

Voted.

Ditto

[CinderDee]

Voted!

[panda]

voted

[KJS]

68%• The problem is inadequate training, so regulations should focus on the owner, not the dogs.
19%• Pit bulls are prone to overprotection or violence, so regulating them makes sense.
11%• Restrictions should only apply to dogs with a history of attacks.
1%• Let all dogs run free — people need to wise up and protect themselves.
0%• Not sure
0%• Don't care
Total Voters: 218

[gayrghts]

68%• The problem is inadequate training, so regulations should focus on the owner, not the dogs.

11%• Restrictions should only apply to dogs with a history of attacks.

I'm kindof torn between these 2 responses....

what do others of you think?

[Malli]

ultimately I think the owner should be responsible for the dog's actions, trained or not, so I voted for the top one