On March 01 2008, 12:24 PM, Beth wrote::shock: Woah! Let's not get too excited about this, ladies. We still have to make it to the vet's to have Velvet scanned for a chip.
On March 01 2008, 12:54 PM, amazincc wrote:On March 01 2008, 12:24 PM, Beth wrote::shock: Woah! Let's not get too excited about this, ladies. We still have to make it to the vet's to have Velvet scanned for a chip.
You NAMED her...
On March 01 2008, 1:11 PM, madremissy wrote:On March 01 2008, 12:54 PM, amazincc wrote:On March 01 2008, 12:24 PM, Beth wrote::shock: Woah! Let's not get too excited about this, ladies. We still have to make it to the vet's to have Velvet scanned for a chip.
You NAMED her...
Sure sign, if no chip, Velvet has a new home. Yeah.
On March 01 2008, 2:43 PM, Beth wrote:No clue who was watching her and neither does the Mother. She was very surprised to find out the dog was not at a vet's office because they usually drop her at a vet's (not mine) to be looked after.
But DH and I plan on telling the owners we would be more than happy to dog-sit for this little cutie any time.
On March 01 2008, 3:03 PM, Patch O' Pits wrote:Wow that is strange . I wonder if they dropped her off to be watched or actually just dumped her
(??????)
She is very pretty
Return to Four Legged, Finned and Feathered Family Members
Users browsing this forum: No registered users