bullymommy wrote:Verderben wrote:Maryellen wrote:omg did you see the pic with the puppies in the bathroom??? that was alot of poop in there.....
OH and here is how the "premium" diet is handled. Would you consider this proper handling of raw meat?? I don't and it's no wonder the dogs all end up with coccidia and giardia. Both litters in the tourquois poop pen had coccidia. He also adopted out a litter with Babesia.
excuse my language in advance but that is smurfing GROSS!!! (sorry michelle but i needed to have the f word stick!)
Verderben wrote:OH and here is how the "premium" diet is handled. Would you consider this proper handling of raw meat?? I don't and it's no wonder the dogs all end up with coccidia and giardia. Both litters in the tourquois poop pen had coccidia. He also adopted out a litter with Babesia.
Jaime wrote:verderben- nice to see you bashing eric's practices when you yourself are on several DNA lists. what gave you away was the pic of Bane that you posted. you are hiding your identity because many people here would not have welcomed you.
anyhow, tiffany, i mean highvoltage, i mean princess kitty, enjoy your fame you yourself should be questioned for you practices...
here's her stuff --
Here is the link-
http://www.starkcountycjis.org/cjis2/docket/main.html
it will ask you to choose a 'court' and a 'division', just choose 'all' to return the most results.
put her name in and be sure to spell it right
TIFFANY SKOTNICKY
(last name first)
This is number 2004 CRB 03828
Date
Docket Entry
11-15-2004 DEFENDANT FAILED TO PAY COURT COST, UNPAID COURT COSTS TURNED OVER TO TBS. TOTAL AMOUNT $91.00.
08-12-2004 COURT COSTS DUE BY 10-07-2004
08-12-2004 IT IS SO ORDERED BY JUDGE JOHN POULOS
08-12-2004 ADDITIONAL FINDING(S): ALL DOGS HAVE BEEN DESTROYED. NO ADDITION COMMUNITY SERVICE ORDERED, DEFENDANT TO COMPLETE COMMUNITY SERVICE ON CASE 2004CRB2636, MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES.
08-12-2004 FURTHER ON THE FOLLOWING ORDER(S): PAY $50.00 TODAY.
08-12-2004 DEFENDANT IS CREDITED WITH 2 DAYS SERVED IN LIEU OF DAYS.
08-12-2004 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT ALL BUT 2 DAYS ARE SUSPENDED ON CONDITION OF DEFENDANT'S GOOD BEHAVIOR FOR TWO YEARS
08-12-2004 IT IS THE SENTENCE OF THE COURT: COUNT #1 NO DOG LIABILITY INSURANCE 180 DAYS IN JAIL AND COSTS.
08-12-2004 THE COURT FINDS THE DEFENDANT GUILTY.
08-12-2004 DEFENDANT ENTERED A PLEA OF NO CONTEST
08-12-2004 ON THIS DAY THE DEFENDANT APPEARED WITHOUT COUNSEL
08-05-2004 TIME WAIVER FILED.
08-05-2004 COPY(IES) OF COMPLAINTS SERVED ON DEF. AND DEF. WAS ADVISED OF LEGAL RIGHTS IN OPEN COURT. DEFENDANT ENTERED A PLEA OF NOT GUILTY. JUDGE JOHN POULOS ASSIGNED TO CASE. PRE-TRIAL HEARING SET FOR 08-12-2004 @ 9:00 AM
08-01-2004 DEFENDANT RELEASED ON OWN RECOGNIZANCE DUE TO EMERGENCY RELEASE ON 07-31-2004
08-01-2004 ARRAIGNMENT SET ON: 08/05/2004@ 9:00 A.M.
08-01-2004 TRANSFERRED; STARK COUNTY JAIL IN LIEU OF BOND 07/30/2004
08-01-2004 FORM 8 FILED
08-01-2004 1 COMPLAINT FILED.
08-01-2004 DATE OF ARREST: 07/30/2004
08-01-2004 955.22 (M1) - NO DOG LIABILITY INSURANCE
thought you should all know who your new member is--you all know her from being banned elsewhere- she is not new to forums....
call2arms wrote:C'mon Cheeky, we need pictures of that. You can also show us the meat thawing, how you cut it, and also why not, while we're at it, take a picture of the chewed meat in Munkee's mouth?
Everybody is always anxious to see such things.
Seriously. That meat in the tub picture is disgusting. No offense anyone, but isn't meat supposed to thawe in the refrigerator? That just sounds like, with tha amount of meat in there, that it would a- take a veeery long time to thawe and b- long enough so the water becomes warm and starts a bacteria fest. I could be wrong, I don't eat meat and know little about how to handle it.
Jaime wrote:just making note of hypocracy here from some... also this info -besides lila was ALSO from like umm say 2 years or so ago-- are you DEFENDING highvoltage APBT?? her actions will be condoned here? that is curious
Jaime wrote:just making note of hypocracy here from some... also this info -besides lila was ALSO from like umm say 2 years or so ago-- are you DEFENDING highvoltage APBT?? her actions will be condoned here? that is curious
Jaime wrote:just making note of hypocracy here from some... also this info -besides lila was ALSO from like umm say 2 years or so ago-- are you DEFENDING highvoltage APBT?? her actions will be condoned here? that is curious
Sue wrote:Jaime wrote:just making note of hypocracy here from some... also this info -besides lila was ALSO from like umm say 2 years or so ago-- are you DEFENDING highvoltage APBT?? her actions will be condoned here? that is curious
You are comparing one incident to MANY MANY incidents that continue to happen. And I doubt that anyone will condone her actions.... but we all condoned D's actions right? At least that's what you were all told
I just find the whole thing odd... how is Lila's "surprise" temp different than your situation with your foster dog? Both temps were not what was expected... Lucky you only had to deal with dog aggression...
mnp13 wrote:It appears the report is about not having liability insurance, and $100,000 in insurance is mandated by Ohio's BSL. Confiscated dogs are destroyed if you can't show proof of insurance and the insurance is expensive.
The IWPA had a warning about bringing bull breeds to Ohio for pulls. Some counties are very strict about it, other are not.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users