mnp13 wrote: It's not worth the risk and he's not a pet, he's a working dog.
mnp13 wrote:he's not a pet, he's a working dog.
*wishing their was a "clapping" icon*
Blitzkrieg Staffords wrote:mnp13 wrote:he's not a pet, he's a working dog.
he's not a companion, he's a tool, would have been more appropriate? Why have a dog if it can't be both? Oh well. Nice looking dog though.
SisMorphine wrote: MOST WORKING DOGS CANNOT BE PETS AND WORK AT THE SAME TIME! It's a pretty difficult concept for most people to grasp and I always like to applaud those who see the differences.
Blitzkrieg Staffords wrote:mnp13 wrote:he's not a pet, he's a working dog.
he's not a companion, he's a tool, would have been more appropriate? Why have a dog if it can't be both? Oh well. Nice looking dog though.
mnp13 wrote:SisMorphine wrote: MOST WORKING DOGS CANNOT BE PETS AND WORK AT THE SAME TIME! It's a pretty difficult concept for most people to grasp and I always like to applaud those who see the differences.
Don't applaud me, it's not a concept I am all that comfortable with at this point, but I am learning.
There are many working dogs who can be pets and work well, and there are many more than can not. Riggs is in the 'not' catagory, though I am sure that he will be able to have more (supervised) house time as training progresses.
SisMorphine wrote:Since I work with Greyhound rescue I deal with this on a daily basis. MOST WORKING DOGS CANNOT BE PETS AND WORK AT THE SAME TIME! It's a pretty difficult concept for most people to grasp and I always like to applaud those who see the differences.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users