KJS wrote:Yes I understand...but really whatever the reason behind the bashing...whether you dont like the dogs or the breeders or the unethical breeders...its done now...I'll just keep quiet about these healthy dogs of mine from now on
Point to note is that most of the dogs I have seen on the US sites are SERIOUSLY overweight( mine are just a little bit taller and heavier than a Staffy Bull)...I know over there the belief is that 'Bigger is Better'...but maybe not so...huh?
SisMorphine wrote:I wouldn't consider the dogs you posted to be "primitive breeds" . . . and that is coming from an owner/addict of one of them (Alapahas). Those breeds are people attempting to get back to the bulldogs of yore, in most cases. They are new breeds, not primitive breeds, and in many cases (like the Valley and Victorian) are still being bred commonly has F1s and F2s.
Dog_Shrink wrote:What I was meaning by primitive is that not a lot of new blood has been introduced to change the type much from the original foundation stock... not primitive like Pharoah hound and saluki primitive.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users