TheRedQueen wrote:The "Socialization Camp" sounds wack... What's the purpose of not talking to the dog during a stressful situation?
Kerstieazy wrote:Well I just guess I am confused on what to do because they do play together very well most of the time. so i guess I would feel bad if they never got to doggie play anymore because I know that I can play with him but he likes to play with bowser, usually.
Mac is in obedience class. He has been since I got him and plan to keep doing it and going through the other levels of obedience they offer.
katiek0417 wrote:TheRedQueen wrote:The "Socialization Camp" sounds wack... What's the purpose of not talking to the dog during a stressful situation?
Well....I guess the purpose would be if the dog is stressed, and you're talking to the dog, it might be perceived as reinforcement....think about the dog that's afraid of thunder and you sit there and say "it's okay, don't worry..." in a sing-song voice...
In a group situation, it might be hard to monitor what EVERYONE is saying, so it's easier to have a "no talking" policy....
TheRedQueen wrote:Yeah, I guess that makes sense on a certain level...but it still sounds hinky to me. Especially for someone claiming to be a behaviorist. I'd rather have someone telling me *how* to talk/touch my dog in certain situations.
And I've been hearing a lot lately about how talking or "coddling" during stressful/fearful moments doesn't really reinforce anything. I think it was Dr. Patricia McConnell's blog a few weeks ago...talking about how it doesn't really make things worse. If you're scared of thunder, someone telling you NOT to be scared of the thunder won't make a difference.
...it was her blog:
http://www.theotherendoftheleash.com/yo ... derstorms/
Users browsing this forum: No registered users