Sex abuse involving a pit bull!

Pits in the news and info on Breed Specific Legislation.

Postby Ellena » October 24th, 2006, 2:12 pm

Man Accused of Having Relations With Dog




Sunday, October 22, 2006 3:45 PM EDT

TACOMA, Wash. - A man accused of having sex with the family dog has been charged under the state's new animal cruelty law, which makes bestiality a felony, a prosecutor said.

Michael Patrick McPhail, 26, of nearby Spanaway, pleaded not guilty Thursday to one count of first-degree animal cruelty in Pierce County Superior Court.

Assistant Pierce County Prosecutor Karen Watson said McPhail was the first person in Pierce County to be charged with the new bestiality offense.

She said the dog was taken by animal control.

McPhail posted $20,000 bail on Friday.

Judge Katherine Stolz has set a trial date of Dec. 11.

McPhail's wife told investigators that she found her husband on their back porch Wednesday night having intercourse with their 4-year-old female pit bull terrier, the Pierce County sheriff's office report said. The dog was squealing and crying, according to charging papers.

The woman took photos with her cell phone and called the sheriff's office.

Calls to McPhail's public defender, David Katayama, were not immediately returned Friday.

The bestiality law, which took effect in June, was prompted by a case near Enumclaw in which a Seattle man died after having sex with a horse. Before the law was enacted, Washington was one of 14 states where bestiality had not been explicitly prohibited.

Information from: The News Tribune,

A service of the Associated Press(AP)
http://www.pnwpbr.com
http://pnwpbr.aceboard.com/
http://www.petfinder.com/shelters/pnwpbr.html
<img src="http://img113.imageshack.us/img113/5182/label200702110826169580ag8.gif" alt="Image Hosted by ImageShack.us">
User avatar
Ellena
Confident Young Bully
 
Posts: 456
Location: Vancouver, WA

Postby cheekymunkee » October 24th, 2006, 2:15 pm

I think I would have shot him too, but NOT with a camera.
There's a fine line between genius and insanity. I have erased this line.

Debby
User avatar
cheekymunkee
I Have Your Grass
 
Posts: 28540
Location: Dallas

Postby Jenn » October 24th, 2006, 2:21 pm

Oh my god that is disgusting!!
User avatar
Jenn
undecided
 
Posts: 11382
Location: TX

Postby Ellena » October 24th, 2006, 2:24 pm

Sad thing is that now the poor abused girl sits in the local shelter and the wife wont take her back. :(
http://www.pnwpbr.com
http://pnwpbr.aceboard.com/
http://www.petfinder.com/shelters/pnwpbr.html
<img src="http://img113.imageshack.us/img113/5182/label200702110826169580ag8.gif" alt="Image Hosted by ImageShack.us">
User avatar
Ellena
Confident Young Bully
 
Posts: 456
Location: Vancouver, WA

Postby iluvk9 » October 24th, 2006, 4:05 pm

That poor dog ~ And you are right, Ellena; first the abuse then separated from her home.

I truly hope the wife thinks twice before she hops in bed with her husband again. G-R-O-S-S.
iluvk9
I'm Cougarific!
 
Posts: 14900
Location: New York

Postby pocketpit » October 24th, 2006, 6:03 pm

The dog seems very sweet but she also has a bite history (and no, the bites were not family members). They also have the dog's son impounded as well.

Why would you have sex with your dog on your porch? Assuming of course that you were interested in having sex with your dog :shock:

And while I'm sure the wife was just trying to gather proof by taking photos with her cell phone, the whole family's name is now smeared. Her poor kids are probably the laughing stock of the school yard.

I guess it's good that she got photos because that's the only way they are going to be able to prosecute this guy. Physical exam, blood work, urinanalysis, and radiographs revealed nothing that could support her other claims of abuse towards the dogs :(
User avatar
pocketpit
Supremely Bully
 
Posts: 1201
Location: WA

Postby Ellena » October 25th, 2006, 2:42 pm

FYI, the dogs are safe (there were 3 in the home)
http://www.pnwpbr.com
http://pnwpbr.aceboard.com/
http://www.petfinder.com/shelters/pnwpbr.html
<img src="http://img113.imageshack.us/img113/5182/label200702110826169580ag8.gif" alt="Image Hosted by ImageShack.us">
User avatar
Ellena
Confident Young Bully
 
Posts: 456
Location: Vancouver, WA

Postby iluvk9 » October 25th, 2006, 3:58 pm

I received this information. Permisson was granted to crosspost.

ACTION NEEDED is also listed on Pasado's Safe Haven's website:
http://www.pasadosafehaven.org/CRUELTY% ... TY_BOY.htm
iluvk9
I'm Cougarific!
 
Posts: 14900
Location: New York

Postby luvmyangels » October 25th, 2006, 4:58 pm

This story just makes me want to :puke:

I would have taken the picture and then kick the ever living poop out of him.
luvmyangels
I live here
 
Posts: 3449
Location: NY

Postby pocketpit » October 26th, 2006, 1:44 am

FYI, the dogs are safe (there were 3 in the home)


Good to hear!
User avatar
pocketpit
Supremely Bully
 
Posts: 1201
Location: WA

Postby pocketpit » October 26th, 2006, 1:55 am

Sorry I just read the link provided and that makes me want to puke as much as the violation of the poor dog.

Psado's only wants these dogs because they are high profile and will bring in donations and interest for their group. They won't normally touch Pit Bulls unless there is some big sob story behind it.
User avatar
pocketpit
Supremely Bully
 
Posts: 1201
Location: WA

Postby iluvk9 » October 26th, 2006, 6:25 am

On October 26 2006, pocketpit wrote:Psado's only wants these dogs because they are high profile and will bring in donations and interest for their group. They won't normally touch Pit Bulls unless there is some big sob story behind it.


:explode:

This is what annoys me SO much! I am the type of sucker that would give donations for situations like this. After getting burned one time too many, I now find try to find someone who personally knows the rescue and can vouch for them.

This leads to me giving less donations and I am probably missing out on helping a dog that truly would benefit.

Uggghhhh!
iluvk9
I'm Cougarific!
 
Posts: 14900
Location: New York

Postby luvmyangels » October 26th, 2006, 10:08 am

On October 26 2006, iluvk9 wrote:
On October 26 2006, pocketpit wrote:Psado's only wants these dogs because they are high profile and will bring in donations and interest for their group. They won't normally touch Pit Bulls unless there is some big sob story behind it.


:explode:

This is what annoys me SO much! I am the type of sucker that would give donations for situations like this. After getting burned one time too many, I now find try to find someone who personally knows the rescue and can vouch for them.

This leads to me giving less donations and I am probably missing out on helping a dog that truly would benefit.

Uggghhhh!


Wow that is screwed up!!!!
luvmyangels
I live here
 
Posts: 3449
Location: NY

Postby cheekymunkee » October 26th, 2006, 11:44 am

On October 26 2006, 12:55 AM, pocketpit wrote:Sorry I just read the link provided and that makes me want to puke as much as the violation of the poor dog.

Psado's only wants these dogs because they are high profile and will bring in donations and interest for their group. They won't normally touch Pit Bulls unless there is some big sob story behind it.


Yup, and what do you want to bet that as soon as the outrage & the donations stop..........the dogs will be dumped. Just like they dumped Katrina dogs.
There's a fine line between genius and insanity. I have erased this line.

Debby
User avatar
cheekymunkee
I Have Your Grass
 
Posts: 28540
Location: Dallas

Postby Jenn » October 26th, 2006, 2:40 pm

Well that's just disgusting as well. Poor dogs..
User avatar
Jenn
undecided
 
Posts: 11382
Location: TX

Postby pocketpit » October 26th, 2006, 3:18 pm

Yup, and what do you want to bet that as soon as the outrage & the donations stop..........the dogs will be dumped. Just like they dumped Katrina dogs.


Exactly!
User avatar
pocketpit
Supremely Bully
 
Posts: 1201
Location: WA


Return to Pit Bull news and BSL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MSNbot Media

cron